Open Letter to Ratepayers

Open Letter to Ratepayers

Ratepayers  - you may not have noticed the small notice in the Guardian recently advising you of the Electors Meeting tomorrow Tuesday at the Council Offices at 5.30pm.

This meeting isa once a year opportunity for you asa ratepayer to have your say about the operations and decision making of Council – Don’t waste it.

Preferably you should put any questions you have in writing to Council beforehand so as to allow time for a researched answer. 

Ratepayers I urge you to spend an hour or so of your time to show the Council you care.  The opportunity is yours – come along and ask why the Council do what they do with your money.  Remember it’s your money the Council spend.

Regards

Max Correy

Video interviews with all Mayoral Candidates for Geraldton

The team at the ABC Midwest recently interviewed all of the candidates for position of Mayor for the City of Greater Geraldton. 

We think you'll find it helpful to hear from each candidate to get a glimpse into the person behind the name.

Below are the videos of each of the interviews. 

Videos produced by Chris Lewis. Interviews conducted by Glenn Barndon. 

Click here to view videos if they're not displaying for you. 


Ian Carpenter

2015 Mayoral candidate Ian Carpenter.

This week on Mornings we're talking to all five of the Mayoral candidates for the City of Greater Geraldton. We're asking them why people should vote for them to be Mayor. This morning we spoke to incumbent Mayor Ian Carpenter which you can watch here.

Posted by ABC Midwest and Wheatbelt on Sunday, 4 October 2015

Rob Jefferies

2015 Mayoral candidate Rob Jefferies.

This week on Mornings we're talking to all five of the Mayoral candidates for the City of Greater Geraldton. We're asking them why people should vote for them to be Mayor. This morning we spoke to Rob Jefferies.

Posted by ABC Midwest and Wheatbelt on Monday, 5 October 2015

Gavin Hirschhausen

2015 Mayoral candidate Gavin Hirschhausen..

All this week on Mornings we're asking the Mayoral candidates for the City of Greater Geraldton why people should vote for them. This morning we spoke to candidate Gavin Hirschhausen.

Posted by ABC Midwest and Wheatbelt on Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Shane Hill

2015 Mayoral candidate Shane Hill.

All this week on Mornings we're asking the Mayoral candidates for the City of Greater Geraldton why people should vote for them. This morning we spoke to candidate Shane Hill.

Posted by ABC Midwest and Wheatbelt on Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Shane Van Styn

2015 Mayoral candidate Shane Van Styn.

All this week on Mornings we asked all five Mayoral candidates for the City of Greater Geraldton why people should vote for them. This morning we spoke to candidate Shane Van Styn.

Posted by ABC Midwest and Wheatbelt on Thursday, 8 October 2015

Some interesting Q and A's from the City of Greater Geraldton

On Monday, 10 August 2015 the City Executive Management Team met with Community Summit participants and presented the 2015/16 budget and how outcomes of the Community Summit informed the budget process.

During the briefing, Summit Participants were able to ask questions, some of which CEO, Ken Diehm, answered during the session.  Summit participants were also invited to review the documents presented at the briefing and submit any questions they had relating to the budget byFriday 21 August. 

The City has collated all the questions asked during the briefing and those received since and provided responses.


Budget Briefing Questions and Answers

a. With a 25% increase in rates what’s the money value of this increase?  

In some cases, the increase in property valuations has equated to $100s and in some case $1000s of dollars in increases in rates for individual rate payers.

b. How does the City tell or let the Valuer General know what the properties are worth so the valuations are more realistic?  

The City is not involved with property evaluations it is done by the state government, specifically the Valuer General. Property valuations were completed in 2014, so they aren’t necessarily accurate to today’s values. In the valuation process, the Valuer General looks at what properties could be rented at and makes estimates accordingly. These are estimates and are not about what your property is worth rather, what you could rent that property out for. If you are interested in a rule of thumb calculation just take your rates notice and divide it by 52 and if you think you could have rented your property out for that weekly amount 12 months ago, then your valuation is likely to be correct. If there is a significant difference then you may want to consider appealing the valuation by submitting a written query to the Valuer General’s Office within 60 days of receiving your Annual Rates Notice or Interim Rates Notice.

c. Why did Council manipulate the valuations increase at the expense of others?  

People live at their properties and are subject to valuation increase or decreases which occur at no fault of their own. Council has decided to cushion or soften the blow of these large increases so that they these rate payers don’t suffer the results of huge fluctuations in property valuations. The valuation is nothing more than a tax which is based on the perception of people’s capacity to pay according to their property valuation - not the services provided to each rate payer. The phasing in of valuation increases over three years using concessions ensures that all property owners are not unfairly penalised as a result of large valuation increases.

d. How much information does the council take from the community and put forward to the Valuer General so they can more accurately assess the value of properties? Do they take into account the level of development or the downturn in the economy?  

The City can have discussions with the Valuer General about the economy and development going on in the areas but the Valuer General looks at the rental value of properties in a point in time and this point is about 12 months before the evaluations are made public. There is no ability for the City to manoeuvre or influence this process. We can raise these issues with them but we can’t make changes to the valuations. Also, the Valuer General doesn’t attempt to predict what market conditions could be in 12 months’ time. They base their valuations on what the properties could be rented for at that particular time.

e. Are cricket wickets still being funded? What about boat ramps?  

The City has identified significant inequities in provision of services to sporting clubs. Some clubs get a lot of assistance from the City and other clubs in the same sport get none. There is currently no policy or process to determine who gets funding and who doesn’t. We don’t want to reduce the amount of funding we provide to clubs, however, we want to provide a level playing field so funding is allocated in a more equitable and transparent way. The City has partnered with the Mid West Sports Federation and is working together with them to develop an equitable scheme so every sports club gets a fair share. The scheme will need to have a transparent and accountable process so people understand why they are getting the amount of funding and services they receive. Until the scheme is implemented we will maintain the service we are providing.

We aren’t building a new boat ramp in the West End we are renewing the existing finger jetty to make it safe. This project is 75% funded by the State Government.

f. In regard to community grants, is it possible to invite the groups that have experienced cuts and discuss how these groups can survive in the future? This will allow groups to come up with suggestions on how to become sustainable.  

The City is always working with community groups to build their capacity and network like-minded groups so they can learn from and support each other. A revised Community Grants Policy has recently been endorsed by Council and once the first round is offered we will be able to see where assistance in the community is required and look at how this can be provided.

g. Is the City planning to refit playgrounds with new equipment as the kids need something to do in the parks?  

A report on the condition of play equipment located in parks across the City region conducted by industry specialists has been completed and submitted to the City for review.

$349,000 has been allocated in this year’s budget to fund the renewal of playground equipment. However, according to the report it would cost an estimated $1.7M to replace all of the play equipment.

To assist in prioritising which parks will have their play equipment repaired or replaced the City is utilising the Public Open Space Strategy.

Playground equipment in parks listed as high priority in the strategy will be replaced progressively in the next few months. Until this work is completed, the fences will remain in place to ensure community safety.

Where parks have had their equipment removed or identified as non-compliant and are not listed as high priority in the strategy, these may not be replaced in the near future.

A report to Council is currently being prepared on this matter identifying those parks that will have their playground equipment replaced or removed. The report will be available from the Council website as part of the Council meeting agenda on 22 September 2015.

h. How much are we spending on City Wi-fi?  

The City currently spends approximately $75,000 on providing free Internet which is spread across three distinct service areas;

1. Encompasses six Wifi nodes along the Foreshore, one node at QPT,2 nodes at QEII, four nodes at the airport and 1 node at the Aquarena.

2. Encompasses Wi-Fi and Public internet at the Geraldton Regional Library and Mullewa Library & Mullewa Chambers.

3. Encompasses free internet for the Seniors public computers at the QE2.  

The City has negotiated a reduction in the cost of delivery for the Public Wei-Fi service effective July 2016.

i. Beresford Foreshore development. Is this going to be similar to the original proposal that the community had input on four or five years ago or is it more of a protection of coast plan? What effect will work in this area have on beaches north of Beresford?  

The plan is generally consistent with what the community said in previous engagement. We have spent over $500,000 in developing a cost effective solution that will work and take into account sea level rise. The design solution takes into account new data that has been gathered specifically for this project to both inform and validate the design solution. I doubt that there is anyone in this community with the depth of knowledge and experience that hasn’t been considered by these experts. Underwater reefs, geotextile sand containers, offshore breakwaters, do nothing, dune management – every possible factor has been considered. Detailed design is still being finalised and we will work with NACC to engage with the community. However, this is a highly technical and specialised area and we are working with experts. Although we will be showing the community what we are planning, they won’t have input into the technical design as this has to be done by technical experts.

j. Is the City aware that asbestos and other rubbish dumped in the sand dunes in the past is now exposed due to erosion? It’s unsafe.  

The City must comply with and enforce the Health (Asbestos) Regulations 1992 under the Health Act 1911 and the Department of Environment and Regulations Guidelines for the Assessment, Remediation and Management of Asbestos-Contaminated Sites in Western Australia. The City provided a report to the Department of Environmental Regulation on the clean-up and will act on any further advice received from them. The City will look at how to address wider issue of exposure of legacy fly-tipping in environmentally sensitive areas.

k. What is the total expenditure this financial year?  

The total financial expenditure this financial year is $141,000,000.

l. What happened to the money that was going to be spent on St George’s Beach last year?  

We’ve met with residents about St George’s Beach to hear their concerns. A few years ago St George’s Beach wasn’t considered to be at risk of coastal erosion so something has happened and we need to understand what; that’s why we are gathering additional coastal information that will inform a design solution that addresses the coastal issues and resident’s concerns.

m. Reduction of recurrent and non-recurrent community grants. Has the City put forward an advocacy or submission for State and Federal governments to pick up this funding for community services?  

There are a number other state and federal funding agencies that provide funding support to community groups. The City will continue to keep community groups advised of these funding opportunities.

n. What are the costs involved in the ANZAC Day Commemorative services?  

The ANZAC Day Commemorative Service includes the City’s partnership contribution to the RSL which is approx. $14,500. This includes a Dawn Service held at 6am and the Main Service held at 11am in Geraldton. They are collectively attended by between 8,000-10,000 community members.

o. Why was the annual verge side collection cancelled?  

Council made the decision to discontinue the annual bulk verge side collection based on comments and suggestions made by Community Summit participants about the service and its ranking on the priority list of services. The ranking was the result of a holistic review of all non-mandatory services in relation to identifying cost savings. However, the City will be providing an alternate service for pensioners which will entail one free bulk bin dropped to their property. This will be subject to an application to the City and the service will commence in October.

p. Will the construction of the new dog pound be awarded to local contractors?  

The City must comply with the Local Government Act in any procurement process. The Act stipulates that Contracts valued at over $100,000 must be (advertised or issued) as a state wide public tender. In compliance with the Act, the City does have a Regional Price Preference Policy which aims to maximise the use of competitive regional businesses in the procurement of goods and services. Before awarding any contract the City examines each tender against criteria to assess whether or not the company has the required knowledge and experience to deliver the project on time and within budget outlined in their submission. The City must ensure rate payers are getting the best value for money in the delivery of projects. To enable more local contractors to be competitive in tendering for projects, the City is undertaking workshops with the business community to provide them with the knowledge and skills required to tender for City projects.

List of all parks and playgrounds that are open or closed

Many folks have been asking for a list of which parks have had their playgrounds closed and which are still open. The City has a web page with the info. 

Click here to visit.  

The following press release from the City provides an update on the situation

 

Play equipment safety audit completed

A report on the condition of play equipment located in parks across the City region conducted by industry specialists has been completed and submitted to the City for review.

The play equipment safety inspections took into consideration the condition and noncompliance of all 167 pieces of play equipment were part of an ongoing program of asset audits the City conducted over an 18 month period. 

City of Greater Geraldton CEO, Ken Diehm, said although the audit took longer than expected the comprehensive report it produced is an important document the City and Council needs to make decisions that put the safety of families and their children first.

“Although it took much longer than the City anticipated to inspect every piece of play equipment across the City the audit report, which is more than 700 pages long, has shown playground equipment is generally in poor condition with 31 pieces being of an unacceptable standard and that many of the soft fall areas need to be upgraded as well.

“Some of these things are safety issues that need to be addressed, that’s why 15 parks have been closed and equipment has been removed and until these issues are rectified playground areas cannot be opened for use by children and their families,” said Mr Diehm.

Although $349,000 has been allocated in this year’s budget to fund the renewal of playground equipment, according to the report it would cost an estimated $1.7M to replace all of the play equipment.

To assist in prioritising which parks will have their play equipment repaired or replaced the City is utilising the Public Open Space Strategy.

“Playground equipment in parks listed as high priority in the strategy will be replaced progressively in the next few months.  Until this work is completed, the fences will remain in place to ensure community safety.

“Where parks that have had their equipment removed or identified as non-compliant and are not listed as high priority in the strategy, these may not be replaced in the near future,” said Mr Diehm.

A report to Council is currently being prepared on this matter identifying those parks that will have their playground equipment replaced or removed.  The report will be available from the Council website as part of the Council meeting agenda.

“I can appreciate the community would like to see the repairs and replacement of play equipment completed as quickly as possible so they can enjoy these facilities with their children and I apologise for the delays however, it is my responsibility as the City CEO to ensure that all play equipment meets safety standards before they are opened again for community use.”

Below is a list of parks currently closed or have had some of their equipment removed and parks that are partially closed where only some of the equipment is available for use.

 

A list of parks which are open, current closed or partially closed to the public can be found at the link at the top of this article. 

As play equipment in parks are reopened to the public, these parks will be added to the website list.

The Public Open Space Strategy is available at the City Civic Centre, Mullewa District Office or on the City website by clicking here. 

Ron Ashplant running again for council

I am seeking your support to become your representative for the Northern Ward. I am married with three children and we live in Waggrakine. 

I offer you the experience of having been a Councillor for the City of Greater Geraldton, I will use this experience to support the ongoing development and provide good leadership for, the northern ward. My decisions are based on merit and common sense, I speak my mind and consult widely with my community.

When previously on council I was a driving force to strengthen the relationship between progress associations and the city council. If I am elected to the council this year I will continue to drive this initiative and lead by example. If elected I will commit a minimum of 10% of my council allowance to be directed towards the progress associations in my ward.

This is my commitment to our community

Thank you for your time
Kind regards
Ron Ashplant

Shane Van Styn announces he is running for Mayor

Another candidate has announce he is running for the office of Mayor. Current councillor Shane Van Styn has released a letter announcing his candidacy, and he states several reasons for running. 

The full release follows:


After talking with many people in the last few months I have been encouraged to run for Mayor.

People tell me they are tired of the City not listening to their demands, tired of buck passing and the never ending requests for more rates to cover increasing costs especially for services not seen as the core business of the City. People want someone who will not only listen and talk but also act.

Sure the City is not responsible for law and order but we can advocate harder for increased Police and tougher sentences, even curfews and not just stay out of the law and order debate claiming simply “it is not our responsibility”.

Sure the City is bearing large cost increases but we can work harder in lowering our overall costs and driving economic efficiencies to keep rate rises low. In my businesses I make these decisions every day as I cannot simply keep lifting my prices.

The current field of candidates, have over a long time, either led our City through heavily opposed amalgamation or the subsequent obscene large rates rises or both. The blow out in current City costs results from these decisions made over the years.

I have been working hard as a Councillor to resolve the difficulties we now face and have been a vocal campaigner against the rate rises and costs excesses of the City, but supported worthwhile projects as required.

We need to get back to basics and fix our roads and footpaths, improve street lighting, support our clubs, protect our environment and heritage, support new businesses and provide quality day to day services expected of a large regional City.

We must also not neglect Mullewa and Greenough; areas that are important parts of our City.

I will work tirelessly to restore confidence in the City by continuing the current drive to be a safer, more economically responsible and more commercially attractive City that listens to its residents. I will be a strong advocate for Geraldton even if in areas traditionally not our responsibility.

I ask voters to elect me as their Mayor to set a fresh direction for our City by restoring the community’s confidence in it.

Shane Van Styn


How do Geraldton's and Chapman Valley's rates compare

Once a narrative or story takes hold in a community, it's hard for facts to make much of a difference in people's minds. People don't really read charts, scientific studies, or do their own research when forming opinions. They read memes on Facebook, news articles that summarise things often in an over simplistic manner, and maybe discuss it with their friends at the pub/scrapbooking/footy training. 

For example, for several years people believed mobile phone towers caused cancer. Despite data showing it not to be the case, successful community campaigns were held that resulted in towers being removed from locations near schools and child care centres. 

So a question we wanted to find out the answer to was how high are Geraldton's rates compared to nearby locations? More specifically, since the very large 27% rate increase that occurred several years ago, have the rather modest increases since then done much to bring us back to par with our neighbours. 

We decided to compare the rate increases over the last four years in Geraldton with neighbouring Chapman Valley. At one point in time CV was to merge with Geraldton. That never happened. Since then, rates have increased in both locations with many Geraldton residents under the impression Geraldton's rates have skyrocketed while Chapman Valley's rates barely budged.

It's not a fair comparison to simply place two rates notices side by side and compare them. That would be an apples to oranges approach.  

So to keep things fair (and simple), we gave both Councils a starting number of 100 for 2011/12, then added to that the % increase each year. 

Here's how they compared:

Chapman Valley

Starting: 100
2012/13 - 7% increase: 107
2013/14 - 7% increase: 114.49
2014/15 - 6% increase: 121.36
2015/16 - 5.5% increase: 128.03

Greater Geraldton

Starting: 100
2012/13 - 27% increase: 127
2013/14 - 2.25% increase: 129.86
2014/15 - 4.7% increase: 135.96
2015/16 - 3.9% increase: 141.26

Using this index Greater Geraldton is higher by 13.23;

Which is 10.33% higher than Chapman Valley. 

So the question:

Over the past four years have Greater Geraldton rates increased by more than Chapman Valley? Yes they have. 

Is it a drastic difference? Debatable. Using this index Geraldton's rates have increased 10.33% more in four years than Chapman Valley's. 

That's not to say that's good news, or bad news. It's just nice to know what the facts are. With the lower increases over the past 3 years, it's not 20% higher, 

If CGG future rate increases are able to be kept below the 4% mark then it's possible Geraldton could come close to CV in the not-too-distant future, unless CV are also able to tighten their belts. 




Opinion: Regarding the job losses at the City of Greater Geraldton

You may have come across some headlines about jobs being axed at the city. 

I think axing is a terrible metaphor to use in this case. It implies the use of a tool with little precision and a lot of brute force. 

At first glance you might think nearly 50 people will be sacked. 

But dig a little deeper and you’ll get a different picture.

The process the City of Greater Geraldton undertook wasn’t simply that of slashing jobs until a magic dollar figure was reached. The process included a fair amount of restructuring, which resulted in the elimination of 73 positions and the creation of 27. 

Here’s a breakdown:

73 positions gone
27 new positions created

net loss of 46 positions

12 of these positions didn’t have anyone employed in them, due to the hiring freeze the city had already implemented
17 of these volunteered for redundancy already

This leaves 17 people who will have the choice of requesting a redundancy package, or asking to form part of a redeployment pool. If they're unable to be redeployed, they may be forced to take a redundancy. 

I had a chat with City of Greater Geraldton CEO Ken Diehm this afternoon about the situation, and his message to staff and the community at large. 

“The hardest challenge for me at the moment is to allow the people that have been impacted to feel that they’ve been treated with respect and dignity. 

"But if you’re one of those people that’s in one of the positions that’s being made redundant, it (does feel) personal, because the message that they feel is that we don’t value the work you do."

"But it’s not personal at all."

"This isn’t about people, it’s about positions."

"We’re hoping to re-employ as many people as possible.”

Mr Diehm shared his concerns regarding the perception behind the changes and the inevitable online discourse. 

“My concern about social media is that people need to realise that those people that are impacted from this are members of our community. They have mortgages, they have car repayments, they have credit cards, they have kids in school, and their future is suddenly very uncertain in their minds. And on top of that, they don’t feel valued. But the majority of them have been loyal, hard working, dedicated, faithful public servants to this community for quite a while.”

Mr Diehm went on to stress that any redundancy, whether by choice or, if it came to it, force, wasn’t due to performance. 

——

While no-one celebrates at the news of a fellow resident losing their job, the moves to reduce staffing levels is a clear sign that Ken Diehm and team have been listening to community feedback, and are doing what they can to see that future rate increases are lower than earlier estimates, and that services in Geraldton are not cut to the point of making the city unliveable. 

You can still expect future rate increases to be a little higher than the CPI due to state and federal government funding cuts to the tune of $3.7M, the multi generational problem of our accumulation of assets that now need repairing or replacing, and the ongoing rises in water and energy costs which form a large part of the CGG's expenses. 

But Mr Diehm says with savings they’ve already found, the restructuring in staffing, and the many “quick wins” found by staff at the city with things like vehicle reductions and car pooling, they’re on track to keep future rises below the 5.2% rate that had been projected. 

——

There are other changes worth mentioning in the restructure. They certainly don’t mitigate any discomfort felt by those who may be out of a job, but do seem to be positive moves by the city in the name of clarity. 

Three of the four departments have had name changes;

Creative Communities becomes Community Services
Sustainable Communities becomes Development and Regulatory Services
Community Infrastructure becomes Infrastructure Services
Corporate and Commercial Services remains the same

Mr Diehm said the name changes better reflected what the departments actually did, rather than use terminology that meant very little to the average resident. 

——

If you’re new to Geraldton, and want a bit of background… 

Over a long period of time, Geraldton, as well as many other councils around the state, had been accumulating new infrastructure without ensuring sufficient funds were available to renew those assets. 

Laws changed such that local governments had to adopt accounting practices that showed the true replacement costs of its infrastructure. For example, a swing at a park might have originally cost $100. Council estimated that it would need to be replaced in ten years. They do the sums and think "sweet, we can afford $100 in ten years." Except in reality a new swing doesn’t cost $100 any more. It’s $400. Oops. 
So we were budgeting for a $100 swing in ten years, but really should have been budgeting for a $400 swing. Once that changed a truer picture emerged of the state of Geraldton’s finances and pending financial problems, and there was a large rate increase of around 27% in 2012. 

That didn’t go over well with the community, and the following two years' rate rises under new CEO Ken Diehm were kept to the relatively low figures of 2.25% and 3.6%. 

At the time of the last budget it was planned that the next ten years would see rate increases of 5.2% each year. 

Recent audits found the problem of assets that needed fixing to be even greater than what was originally thought, revealing essentially a $25M backlog of urgent maintenance work that needed doing. 

However, the feedback Mr Diehm says he’s had from the community is that Geraldton wants future rates increases to be lower than 5.2% if at all possible, hence the staff reductions, restructuring and cost cutting. 

- Jason Smith is the Managing Editor for Everything Geraldton.

City of Greater Geraldton calling for tenders to construct final stage of the West End Revitalisation project

 

The City of Greater Geraldton Council endorses a plan to allow the West End Revitalisation project to proceed to the next stage.

At last night’s Council meeting the Councillors authorised a motion to call for tenders for the construction of the Multi-User Facility and Youth Precinct.

City of Great Geraldton Mayor Ian Carpenter said these two elements formed the final stage of the redevelopment of the Geraldton Foreshore.

“The revitalization of the Geraldton Foreshore commenced in the early 2000’s, with the vision of turning an industrial brownfield site into an integrated public space that the whole community could enjoy,” Mr Carpenter said.

“The final stage of the West End Revitalisation project will see the creation of a new Multi User Facility, which will house various community groups as well as having an open stage area and public open space for community events such as the Australia Day celebrations.”

The Multi-User Facility will be home to the Geraldton Volunteer Marine Rescue Group, TS Morrow and the Geraldton and Districts Offshore Fishing Club. There will also be a function room available to the community and three classrooms for hire.

Mr Carpenter said the design of the Youth Precinct resulted from extensive consultation with the City’s young people. 

“We held several workshops to find out exactly what should be included in the Youth Precinct. The area will consist of a high level climbing structure and a ‘rage cage’ that can be used for various sporting events and functions, as well as a DJ booth and outside table tennis and foosball tables,” he said.

“This project will see the completion of the redevelopment of the Geraldton Foreshore, activate the West End and help cement Geraldton as a must see tourist destination.”

Mr Carpenter said as part of the tenders the City is now implementing separable portions to the tender process.

“This means that the tender will be broken into sub sections. The benefit of this is that more local contractors can be involved in the work.  When the City has received all tenders, the item will then go back to Council to get approval on the final spend and whether the works should be staged,” he said.

Opinion: Regarding the current financial situation at the City of Greater Geraldton, and a brief overview of the last 8 years

For those of you late to the scene, you might wonder why the Geraldton public are so distrustful of the local council. 


Flash back to 2006

A recommendation was made to the Minister for Local Government by the Local Government Advisory Board in August 2006 to amalgamate the Shire of Greenough with the City of Geraldton.

At that time the Shire of Greenough had a pretty good reputation in the community. They were fair to deal with and were very prompt when it came to building approvals and the like. 

The City of Geraldton did NOT have a good reputation, and many community members feared the mess that was the CoG would become the burden of the residents from the Shire of Greenough. 

But the policitians and bureaucrats felt they knew what was best for the simple citizens of the Midwest, and the Shire of Greenough residents had to petition for a referendum to be held. 

The Greenough electors managed to successfully petitioned for a referendum to determine whether the amalgamation should proceed. 

This was held on 2 December 2006, and of those who voted a majority of around 80% voted against the proposal.

However, the politicians and bureaucrats had a loophole. The Local Government Act 1995 (clause 10 of Schedule 2.1) stated as the vote did not attract 50% of registered voters, it did not meet the requirements for a valid poll.

The referendum only had a participation rate of 28.74% (much like councillor elections which still get counted).

So despite having an extremely clear picture of what a majority of people felt, those in charge at the time found a way to do what they wanted rather than what the residents wanted.

Trust was lost. 

Millions of ratepayers dollars was spent on the rebranding. Fancy new number plates were seen around town. 

But things weren't smooth in the newly created city. Building approvals banked up. Builders complained. Developers complained. 

City staff complained. Some of the good ones left. 

The mood in the town was "they don't listen to us any way", and animosity toward the council grew. 


GFC

Then after all that money was spent on rebranding and "gaining efficiencies" the global financial crisis hit and it emerged that the city of Geraldton Greenough had invested substantial amounts in sub-prime derivatives through Lehman Brothers Australia. 

Why on earth was our rate payer's money being invested in high risk complex securities? Geraldton residents were again furious, and no investigation was launched by the WA Department of Local Government. 

Council had invested $2.45 million.

Yes. Million.


Chapman Valley

After this there were discussions between the Shire of Chapman Valley and the City of Geraldton Greenough about merging. But this was under the looming threat of forced mergers from the state government. 

As soon it became clear there would be no forced mergers by the state government, the Shire of Chapman Valley said "Thanks, but no thanks". 

So like any respectful neighbour, the City of Geraldton Greenough tried to enact an aggressive boundary readjustment on the Shire of Greenough to get a chunk of rate paying land from them and of course the coveted area allocated for the Oakajee Port and Industrial Estate. 

The president of the Shire of Chapman Valley, John Collingwood, said the aggressive boundary readjustment would have destroyed the Shire of Chapman Valley, taking around 37% of the rateable income. He also told the ABC that the City of Geraldton Greenough was "trying to destroy us". 

Those were his actual words. 

So the City of Geraldton Greenough wasn't making any friends. 

The community was again in shock. Who ARE these people!?

More trust was lost. More people up in arms. People in Chapman Valley were vehemently against merging with Geraldton Greenough, and they made it clearly known to their council and the State Government. 

The border readjustment did not succeed by the City of Geraldton Greenough. 


Mullewa

Throughout 2010 and 2011 more negotiations were held. This time between the City of Geraldton-Greenough and the Shire of Mullewa, as to whether the two entities should merge.

After a long period of negotiations they decided to merge. 

A poll was requested by both communities and was held on 16 April 2011. 

Again, an overwhelming majority of voters said NO to the merger. 

In fact, in Mullewa it was 83.24% NO.

And in Geraldton-Greenough it was 72.39% NO.

It did not take a university education to realise once again the people who had actually chosen to make the Midwest home did NOT want this merger. 

However, as with EVERY local government election or poll, there was a lower than 50% turnout. 

So Mayor Carpenter, CEO Tony Brun and the rest of the team pushed forward with the unwanted merger. Because of that loophole mentioned earlier. 

The new weirdly shaped mega region was called Greater Geraldton. 

Most people were perplexed by the odd name. Greenough residents felt ripped off that their brand had now been permanently relegated to the annals of history and would no longer be a noun in daily use by the council and its staff. And many residents asked what we were "greater" than?

Surely folk who live in Mullewa don't tell their friends they live in the "Greater Geraldton" region.

It seemed the only thing the unwanted name had going for it was the ability to keep the same initials.

Most of that earlier rebranding was now money down the toilet. More was needed to be spent on the new rebranding.

The citizens of Geraldton, Greenough and Mullewa were told to drink their medicine because the educated bureaucrats knew what was good for us. There would be "efficiencies" and ultimately everyone would get more stuff for less money.

So to restate the obvious, Geraldton residents didn't want to merge. Greenough residents didn't want to merge. Mullewa residents didn't want to merge. Yet it was forced upon everyone anyway. 


The final straw

Trust toward the council and the city was at an all time low. No one believed the people at the city really had the interests and wishes of the residents at heart. It seemed like Geraldton was a grand experiment for them all to practice what they'd learned at "City Planning School". 

Then the icing on the cake. 

The 2012 rate increase. 

People were in shock. Their annual rates bill came in at a 27% increase. Some people and businesses saw increases up to 30%. 

The line from the city was that this increase was needed to cover the shortfall of rates that had been charged for years. Essentially council wasn't leaving enough money in the kitty to fix stuff, and now they needed to. And the best way to do that was put the rates up 27% in one year. 

Businesses were flabbergasted. Home owners were in shock. The Member for Geraldton Ian Blayney said he was speechless (an oxymoron to be sure, but you get the point).  

Yours truly at that point had two houses in Rangeway and a block in Wandina. In part because of that alarming rate bills along with the promise that rates would continue to increase by 7.2% for the foreseeable future, my wife and I realised we couldn't afford to keep those properties, and sold them all.

Many residents shared similar stories.

If people distrusted the council before this, they hated them with a passion afterwards.

Community groups formed. The Chamber lobbied. Meetings were held.

And the CEO Tony Brun, who was perceived as the main energy behind it all resigned and went to Perth. 

At the next council elections only 6 of the 12 councillors were up for a vote. All 6 were replaced except for Shane van Styn who was endorsed by the community group "CGG Ratepayers Demand Change" as he promised to fight for lower rates and reduced council spending. 

The position of Mayor was not up for reelection. 


 

That's a broad overview, but it brings us up to today. 

The $25million backlog

Now we're being told that decisions made by past councils and CEOs have left us with bills we cannot afford to pay. 

Never mind that the people of Geraldton complained loudly every time money was being wasted and were shut down with intelligent arguments about how necessary that particular piece of artwork or infrastructure was. 

The unwanted mergers that were rammed down our throats came with the promise of efficiency gains that never manifested. 

Instead the city is going to have to take drastic measures to curb spending. Redundancies will have to be made within the City staff. Every area of expenditure will have to be looked at to remove waste and the reduce rate payer burden.

But this is NOT drastic. It should be standard operating procedure. 

Ratepayers money should always be treated with the respect it deserves. It should have ALWAYS been the goal of the council and City staff to find ways to reduce the amount of money they need to take off us each year. 

Do we want sealed roads? Sure. 

Do we need yet another fireworks display funded by ratepayers? Not so much. 

Do we want our rubbish collected each week? Absolutely. 

Do ratepayers want to pay for free wifi for backpackers at the library when there's a perfectly good Internet cafe two doors down? Maybe not. 


The current financial situation

CGG CEO Ken Diehm (if you're not paying attention the CEO is the person who the councillors and mayor employ to run the city) understands this thoroughly. 

His media briefing regarding the CGG's current state of affairs was frank, thorough and humble. He should also be commended on the obvious care he has for the wellbeing of the employees of the City. 

It was clear that he understood that the proposed rate increases for the coming years of 5.2% are too high. He, the city staff and the council say they're going to do everything in their power to get them below that number. 

But he didn't over promise either. He was frank about the fact that there was no way future rate rises would be kept as low as the CPI (consumer price index), as the major costs incurred by the council, like power, were generally rising much more than the CPI. 

Moreover, Ken and his team had commissioned auditors to physically go out to the roads and parks, the highways and byways, to inspect all of the assets of the City.

What they came back with wasn't pretty. 

There's essentially a $25 million backlog of urgent maintenance work that needs doing. That's not the kind of news a CEO who's inherited a position following a 27% rate increase wants to hear. 

Worse than that is the projection for the future. In 2027 and 2028 there will be a spike in road infrastructure expenses that the current CGG budget simply doesn't accommodate for. It might seem like someone else's problem because it's so far away, but kicking the can down the road is what has led to the problem we have now. 

So they're facing the music. Which is something. It could all be buried in an obscure public notice  full of technical terms that would cause anyone other than an accountant to glaze over. 

But to Mr Diehm's credit they've chosen to let everyone know the actual state of the union. 

He also explicitly pointed out that every time we build something new, we inherit the costs of maintaining that item and that is hurting us. Even if the funding to build the new hotness comes from another agency, Geraldton ratepayers still bear the burden of maintaining the infrastructure. For every $10 million in new infrastructure, operating costs increase by around $300,000 a year. 

(Yes, this is logical and many of you have been pointing this out for some time.)


Crisis

I don't think this demonstrates a "crisis" like other media headlines have read. 

I think this actually represents a positive turning point in Geraldton's timeline. 

A "crisis" is having leaders who don't or won't listen to the public they're supposed to serve. 

What Ken is doing is showing he has been listening, and is prepared to make the changes needed to help relieve the burden on the ratepayers even if it makes his job a lot harder and a lot more stressful.

The "crisis" is what would happen in 10 years if we don't make some changes now. What the City is doing by offering its staff voluntary redundancies, going over expenditure with a fine tooth comb and aiming to keep rate increases as low as possible is not a crisis. 

It's good news. 

For the first time in a while it feels like Geraldton is in good hands. 


So what's going to happen? 

There will be cut backs at the city. Staff are going to be offered voluntary redundancies. Ken says these will only be granted where the job can be done by someone else, and won't be granted to poor performers. They're looking for at least 20, and will assess the situation in the new year. (To their credit, the city acknowledges this could be an anxious process for some staff members, and has a free employee assistance program in place. Also credit for announcing now and not a post Christmas shock.)

Then the city directors and managers are basically going to look at all the services that ratepayers currently fund. From the Aquarena, to the Queens Park Theatre, to your rubbish being collected, roads built and maintained etc etc. Everything. 

These services will be categorised into "mandatory" and "non-mandatory" services. Expect things like your bins being collected to be mandatory. But things like free wifi at the foreshore isn't exactly a mandatory service. 

Once it's clear what is mandatory, a budget will be done based on these services.

Then non-mandatory services will be rated in order of priority. The city says it will look for input from the community and city staff to do this. 

Any available funds, less around $7.5million needed to fill the gap immediately, will be applied to the non mandatory services in order of their priority. 

This is where it could get messy. One man's mandatory service is another man's waste of money. You might want more shows at the QPT. Another person might prefer more books at the library. Getting a cohesive list of priorities for non-mandatory services might be a challenge, but at least it's being addressed. 

Any services that are unfunded basically don't make the cut, and will be recommended to council for discontinuation. 

The city is also going to look at the "level" of services it offers. For example (and this is our own example, not a prediction) the city might deem the tip is important to keep running, but might reduce the number of hours it is open. 

In addition to this, the city will be assessing what it does with its current assets. In early January it will be reviewing all its assets to determine if they need to be replaced or can be sold or disposed of. 

New capital works (that's code for "building new stuff") will also be reduced, unless a prior community commitment has already been given. 

Revenue

Other non-rates revenue streams will be looked at. 

There are lots of services that rate payers are essentially subsidising at the moment which might be able to be charged for, and these potential streams of income will be looked at. 


So what does this all mean? 

For most of us, we won't notice a thing. The services we know and use will carry on, and hopefully any future rate increases will be reasonable and bearable. 

For some of us there's a chance a beloved ratepayer funded service may reduce or disappear. That seems to be the reality of the financial situation we currently have. 

But long term what would be most exciting is if a culture of genuinely listening to community feedback and acting on it becomes the pillar of how the City of Greater Geraldton operates. 

Regarding the Cemetery vandalism: An ongoing concern

The following has been supplied by the Geraldton Cemetery Board in response to a recent incident reported by some Everything Geraldton readers. (Click here to read original post.)


With reference to the post about trashed graves at Geraldton Cemetery, (Everything Geraldton, Nov 25) the desecration of graves and wanton vandalism is an ongoing issue for the Geraldton Cemetery Board and staff.

Geraldton Cemetery Board Chairman, Max Correy, said the vandalism is not confined to gravesites.

“Apart from the damage and destruction to people’s loved ones’ graves and monuments, the perpetrators also damage and pull out recently planted trees, shrubs and gardens and rip out reticulation systems,” he said.

“Our ground staff – of which there are only two to care for the grounds, operate the cremator and prepare graves – are tired and despairing of arriving at work to discover the vandalism and find reticulation ripped out.

“All of this destruction creates an extra workload for them to replant and re-establish reticulation directing financial resources and their time away from important projects,” said Mr Correy.

The use of the cemetery grounds as a thoroughfare between Eastward Road, Alexander Street and Abraham Street is causing the Cemetery Board great concern and anguish. The Board empathises with the families whose grave sites are being vandalised.

“In spite of the police and Yamatji Patrol’s efforts to eliminate the damage, the vandalism continues unabated,” Mr Correy said.

The only real solution is to erect a security fence but as the cemetery is a self-funded public utility, not a City of Greater Geraldton asset as is commonly believed, the ability to fund such a solution is beyond the Board’s capacity.

“The Board would be interested in any alternative solutions, perhaps we could hold a public appeal to help fund a security fence, as the cemetery’s only form of income is through cremations and burials, and other funding that the Board is able to secure from time to time,” he said.

 

Relocation of Pony Club

Ian Cutler from the Guardian has a good article regarding Council's decision last night on the future of the Spalding Pony Club:

https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/regional/gascoyne/a/25378428/pony-club-move-will-take-three-to-five-years-city/

WA Country Builders will build one of these four things

WA Country Builders are going to build a monument in Geraldton for free.

The decision on what is to be built is to be made by Geraldton residents.


What do you want WA Country Builders to build in Geraldton?


Choose between

  • A welcome entry statement to Geraldton 
  • Upgrade to community garden nursery
  • Marina Beach Seating and Shelter
  • Toilet Blocks @ Back Beach and Glendinning Park

Job opportunities for Aboriginal youth

SMYL Trainees Zemma Connell, Talecah Clayton, Tiffany Collard, Zamaria Councillor (Western Australian Country Health Services Midwest) and Maitland Spratt with SMYL Aboriginal Group Training Manager, Ashley Garlett. 

The City of Greater Geraldton has partnered with SMYL Community Services (South Metropolitan Youth Link) by providing young Aboriginal school students the opportunity to work in local government through a school based traineeship.

SMYL is a charitable organisation that offers Aboriginal students the chance to engage themselves in education, training and employment in the program throughout Western Australia.

City of Greater Geraldton Aboriginal Community Development Officer, Nola Gregory, said the City has taken on four trainees for the duration of the program.

“The traineeships allow Aboriginal students to have an insight of working in local government and the different career opportunities that are available,” she said.

“By working at the City, trainees are able to find what type of work best suits them and what they’re most comfortable in.”

The City has the following Geraldton Senior College students:

  • Maitland Spratt – Automotive Traineeship with Fleet and Support
  • Talecah Clayton – Business Traineeship with Community Law and Safety
  • Tiffani Collard – Business Traineeship with the Aquarena
  • Zemma Connell – Business Traineeship with Arts, Culture and Events.

Western Australian Country Health Services Midwest, Geraldton Sporting Aboriginal Corporation and the Commonwealth Bank have also joined the initiative by taking on an Aboriginal School Based Trainee.

Throughout their traineeship students are mentored by SMYL Manager, Ashley Garlett, who regularly visits Geraldton.

Without the traineeship some students would be at risk of dropping out of school and find the transition from school to work hard.

Aboriginal students can apply by speaking to their VET Coordinators. 

For more information about SMYL Community Services and what programs they offer, visit the website on www.smyl.com.au or contact (08) 9430 4921.

City Burgermeester hosts the Luks for afternoon tea

You may remember John Luk, a local resident who has been voluntarily picking up litter in the city for over 20 years, 3 hours a day. He recently celebrated his 60th wedding anniversary, and Mayor, Ian Carpenter, and CEO, Ken Diehm, hosted John and his wife Anne for afternoon tea. 

Press release from the city below. 



Many people have marvelled at local resident John Luk’s long time commitment to keeping the Beresford Foreshore clear of litter. 

Mr Luk has for many years voluntarily collected rubbish along the beachfront on Chapman Road and you can often see his orange litter bags stacked, groaning under the weight of their bounty at the roadside. 

City of Greater Geraldton Mayor, Ian Carpenter, and CEO, Ken Diehm, hosted afternoon tea with John and his wife Anne last week to celebrate their 60th wedding anniversary and to acknowledge Mr Luk’s unpaid work in collecting litter. 

“I’d like to thank John for his selfless volunteering work in picking up litter on Beresford Beach,” Mr Carpenter said, “well done John and Anne, our community is all the better with people like you in it.” 

The Mayor and CEO presented the Luks with a small gift and flowers. 

“However the highlight for John seemed to be our promise to get him a personalised high vis vest,” said Mr Diehm. 

Mr Luk was delighted and likened it to being recognised by the ‘burgermeester’ (mayor) in his native country of Holland. 

“I will show off the pictures to my family in the Netherlands,” he said proudly.

Anne and John Luk enjoy afternoon tea with Mayor Ian Carpenter and City CEO Ken Diehm

G-Force shows appreciation of City employment

City CEO Ken Diehm is presented with a certificate of appreciation from G-Force Executive Officer, Tony Cooper, along with (from left) City staff - Manager, Corporate Services, Jeff Graham, Acting Sanitation Supervisor, Dave Meneguzzo, Acting Parks Manager, Graham Smith; and Director Community Infrastructure, Neil Arbuthnot.

The City of Greater Geraldton was recently presented with a framed certificate of appreciation from service contractor, G-Force, in recognition of the City’s continued support in employing G-Force workers with a disability. 

Presenting City CEO Ken Diehm with the certificate, G-Force Executive Officer, Tony Cooper, said it was organisations like the City that has allowed the not-for-profit company to be successful. 

“Without the likes of the CGG assisting us with this, we would not be where we are today,” he said. 

“For a number of years now, the City has used G-Force to provide staff to assist with the street sweeping of Marine Terrace and Foreshore Drive under the guidance of Parks Manager Kim Trotter and Sanitation Supervisor, Stuart Gilchrist.” 

G-Force recently won the Goodness Festival 2014 Best Social Enterprise in Geraldton Award. 

“This was a great outcome as we continue to strive with our mission of employing people with disabilities within the community, on full rates of pay,” Mr Cooper said. 

“G-Force does not receive any form of government funding and we have to source our own contracts. 

“We are able to offer services in all aspects of garden care and clean up, commercial cleaning, window cleaning and document and paper shredding.” 

Mr Diehm said he is pleased the City is able to support G-Force.

“The City recognises the value of this work and the social investment in getting people back into the workforce,” he said. 

G-Force can be contacted on 9964 3525 or www.gforcecontracting.com

Feeling Clucky? Sentinel chicken program

The City of Greater Geraldton is looking for a caring home for 12 chickens for 12 months as part of the Sentinel Chicken Testing Program.

If you live on the urban fringe near a river and can care for the chooks, you get to keep the eggs - and the chickens - after the 12 month testing program ceases; however staff from the City’s Health Department will need access to the flock to take blood samples every fortnight.

The program is used across Australia and internationally to monitor potentially serious mosquito-borne viruses which can be spread to humans.

Testing of chicken serum samples provides early warning of increased Murray Valley Encephalitis virus and Kunjin virus activity in the Geraldton area.

Chickens are used in this program as mosquitos are attracted to them however they do not get ill from the virus and cannot pass it on to humans or other chickens.

The Aborvirus Surveillance and Research Laboratory at the University of WA will provide the 6-9 week old chicks and they will be looking for their new home on October 9.

A fox proof fence with easy human access and separation from other chooks is all that is needed and if you think you could help, contact Viraj Ballanthuda Achchige at the City on 9956 6933.